Report Date: 20 April 2015

PortfolioDirect/resources

Report Index

  Where Are We In the Cycle?
   Metal Prices Approaching Trough Exit Phase

The Current View

Growth in demand for raw materials peaked in late 2010.  Since then, supply growth has continued to outstrip demand leading to inventory rebuilding or spare production capacity.  With the risk of shortages greatly reduced, prices have lost their risk premia and are tending toward marginal production costs to rebalance markets.

To move to the next phase of the cycle, an acceleration in global output growth will be required to boost raw material demand by enough to stabilise metal inventories or utilise excess capacity.

The PortfolioDirect cyclical guideposts suggest that the best possible macroeconomic circumstances for the resources sector will involve a sequence of  upward revisions to global  growth forecasts, the term structure of metal prices once again reflecting rising near term shortages, a weakening US dollar, strong money supply growth rates and positive Chinese growth momentum.  Only one of the five guideposts is "set to green" suggesting the sector remains confined to the bottom of the cycle . 

Has Anything Changed?

Throughout 2014, PortfolioDirect had been characterising the cyclical position as ’Trough Entry’ with some expectation that by the end of 2015 an exit would be evident. Until very late in the year, the evidence supported that possibility before conditions took several backward steps. 

The absence of a growth acceleration among the major economic regions other than the USA is contributing to the flagging momentum.  A stronger US dollar is also imparting a downward bias to US dollar denominated prices presently. This is looking less like a temporary move than a multiyear change of direction. 

The ECB has foreshadowed more monetary stimulus measures.  However, monetary polices supporting asset prices alone are unable to directly affect growth sufficiently to encourage a better outlook for resource sector equities.

Fears about the impact of low oil prices have affected sentiment adversely. The beneficial effect of lower oil prices on demand within the advanced economies has not yet been felt and is still being underestimated as a source of additional output growth.  

IMF Holds Growth Outlook Steady  
PortfolioDirect has been using the momentum of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) global growth revisions as an important indicator of cyclical positioning for the resources sector. Without an acceleration in global growth, a cyclical recovery for the sector is unlikely. 

For the first time since 2010, the IMF has raised its forecasts - a positive sign - but only by 0.1 percentage point for 2016. The forecast for 2015 is unchanged. Among the advanced economies, upward revisions for growth in Europe and Japan have been offset by lower growth elsewhere. Among the emerging markets, large upward revisions for India are offset by cuts to forecasts for Russia, Latin America and Africa.

A critical emerging issue has been a reassessment by the Fund of potential global growth - a potential negative for the resources sector - which it sees as having fallen in both advanced and emerging economies.  The Fund's starting point for growth in 2016 is lower than for any year other than 2010. The expected future acceleration is now very modest by historical standards. 

Greater Confidence about European Growth Expectations  
Staff economists at the European Central Bank have become markedly more optimistic about European growth prospects over the past few months.  They are forecasting a mean euro area GDP expansion of 1.5% in 2015 increasing to 1.9% and 2.1% in the following two years. As recently as December, they had been expecting 1.0% in 2015 and 1.5% in 2016.

The more optimistic tone has come from lower oil prices, a weaker currency helping competitiveness and the impact of the ECB’s monetary policies.

The staff is more optimistic than the non-official consensus.  A quarterly survey of 59 European forecast professionals completed in the first week of April showed a mean growth expectation of 1.4% in 2015 rising to 1.8% in 2017, increases of between 0.1 and 0.3 percentage points from a quarter earlier.

Resource sector investment strategy is a constant search for growth momentum.  These forecast revisions signal rising confidence about the future that has largely been absent from global markets.  It is not enough but is a welcome move in the right direction.

Growing Importance of Advanced Economy Investment  
A rebound in the importance of investment spending in advanced economy output expected by the International Monetary Fund will be critical to the fortunes of the mining industry over the coming five years. 

The half yearly World Economic Outlook released last week by the IMF showed the investment contribution to GDP in emerging economies as having stopped rising while the investment contribution in the advanced economies is expected to push higher, albeit from historically low levels, in 2015 and beyond. 

Relying heavily on private sector decisions, advanced economy investment spending is more discretionary and potentially variable than emerging economy development spending. 

Not surprisingly, when the investment contribution is rising, the metal intensity of overall output is increasing raw material usage rates are at their strongest.  This connection is highlighted in the chart showing global steel production and changes in the investment intensity of global GDP since 1980.  Other factors are also at work but variations in the investment contribution make an important difference to the momentum of raw material consumption growth. 

The chart illustrates the four cyclical classifications used by the E.I.M. investment managers to define the positioning of the metal markets.  The investment managers use the cyclical positioning to inform their recommendations about the allocation of funds within the sector.

Using the prices of the six main daily traded base metals - aluminium, copper, lead, nickel, tin and zinc - the blue line in the chart shows, for the nine price cycles since 1960, the profile of the average adjustment following each cyclical price peak.

The average magnitude of the peak to trough price fall across the nine cycles has been 29%.  The shortest adjustment period occurred in the 14 months after September 2000 when the price indicator fell 31%. The most drawn out adjustments have taken 29 months after prices peaked in February 1980 and in February 1989.  In each instance, prices fell 42%.

The red line in the chart is the trajectory of the current cycle which was 46 months old at the end of February 2015.

PortfolioDirect
E.I.M. Capital Managers