27 October 2025
	Where are we in the Cycle? 
		
		Four guideposts are now "flashing amber" after the recent swing in 
	sentiment about global prospects offered a fresh "red" warning sign.  
	Sluggish productivity growth, exacerbated by war in Europe, intensifying 
	trade restrictions and ongoing central bank worries about inflation, have 
	been a continuing constraint on raw material demand expansion. Global monetary conditions are only 
	slowly becoming less restrictive.  Metal market supply anxieties have dissipated. US dollar 
	strength has given way to a more neutral influence on prices.  Overall, 
	the guideposts are suggesting a low point in the cycle without yet 
	displaying conclusive signs of a  cyclical turn.  
	More...
		
		
		
		Market Directions 
		
		The constraints on capital flows connecting retail equity investors to 
	the riskiest end of the market have loosened over the past three months 
	adding to the flows of professional money which, having discounted a 
	recession and been unaffected by inflationary pressures, had been supporting 
	the most growth oriented and well-established businesses in the industry. 
	Heavily hyped energy storage innovations are yet to affect metal demand as 
	meaningfully as once expected.  Higher metal price risk premiums, where 
	evident, have struggled to impact related equity valuations.   The first 
	crack in the 1990s-style investment performance - when modest sector equity 
	price gains occurred in the midst of sometimes highly disruptive macro 
	conditions - has appeared. 
	More...
		
		
		Portfolio Performance and Positioning
		
		Large losses among companies at the earliest development stages were 
	incurred in the past week with a large majority of companies giving back 
	gains made in the past month.  Results for the best established companies 
	were more mixed.  Despite a cyclical recovery from deeply depressed prices 
	in recent months, the biggest hindrance to the ongoing investment 
	performance of exploration oriented companies remains a continuing dearth of 
	mineral discoveries.  Performance of companies in the Phase II development 
	category also remain under pressure, despite their demonstrable production 
	potential and expected proximity to profits, as relatively high indebtedness 
	and heavy reliance on execution success in sometimes unfamiliar markets test 
	often unproven management. The Phase III category, although comprising 
	companies with stronger commercial credentials and a  less volatile returns 
	profile, is the group most sensitive to capital allocation decisions among 
	institutional fund managers responding to changing sector valuations and 
	relative macro growth expectations.      More...
		
		
		
	Stock Reviews and Rating Analysis 
	
	PortfolioDirect rating reports analyse the quality and risk 
	attributes of proposed mineral developments.  Rating criteria apply to mining and oil and gas stocks at any stage of 
	development.  PortfolioDirect uses a five point rating 
	scale to measure the risk adjusted quality of proposed mineral developments 
	or companies.     
	More...
	
	The 'Steak or Sizzle' blog provides summary judgements on 
	the top performing ASX-listed resources stocks.
	More...